https://wiki.projecttracks.be/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Translations%3AInventariseren_en_waarderen_van_museum%28directeurs%29archief%2F9%2Fen 2026-06-18T02:30:19Z Bewerkingsoverzicht voor deze pagina op de wiki MediaWiki 1.45.1 https://wiki.projecttracks.be/index.php?title=Translations:Inventariseren_en_waarderen_van_museum(directeurs)archief/9/en&diff=24966&oldid=prev 2025-03-28T12:48:36Z

<p>Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met &#039;For the valuation, a choice was made between different valuation tools. ‘Significance 2.0’ and ‘Significance 3.0’ are currently the most well-known. The dis...&#039;</p> <p><b>Nieuwe pagina</b></p><div>For the valuation, a choice was made between different valuation tools. ‘Significance 2.0’ and ‘Significance 3.0’ are currently the most well-known. The disadvantage of ‘Significance 2.0’ is that it does not take into account scores for valuations or the different levels at which valuation occurs. ‘Significance 3.0’ includes extensive guiding questions and does consider scores and levels. A disadvantage is that this tool has not yet been applied to archives. Also, the best-developed examples relate to Australia, making it more difficult to ask questions about the process.</div>

Bart Magnus